Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Trinity Large Thinking
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Arcee AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 37.6 to 14.8.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1350 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1360 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1357 |
Instruction Following Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1334 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Trinity Large Thinking leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1342 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Trinity Large Thinking share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.