Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 14.8.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1210 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1208 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | — |
| LMArena German | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1186 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.