Model comparison
DBRX vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 33.7.
Side by side
| DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DBRX: 32.3 (#262), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1210 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DBRX: 20.5 (#218), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1208 |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DBRX: 22.3 (#265), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#289), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DBRX: 29.4 (#263), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DBRX: 57.7 (#265), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#253), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#271), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.