Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen1.5-14B

Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

32.7

Rank #253 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 32.4 to 14.8.
  • Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.532.7
Released2024-02-292024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Coding12641138
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Qwen1.5-14B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts12451113
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Qwen1.5-14B leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Math12731125
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Qwen1.5-14B leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Expert12231094
MMLU84.6%68.6%
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Qwen1.5-14B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Non-English12581095
LMArena Chinese12481147
LMArena French12751116
LMArena German12581043
LMArena Japanese12041019
LMArena Russian12801046
LMArena Spanish12461085
LMArena Korean1187—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Instruction Following12481102
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Longer Query12591113

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Text12621128
LMArena Creative Writing12351091
LMArena Multi-Turn12751110
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (32.9 vs 33.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen1.5-14B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper