Model comparison

Llama 2-13B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.1

Rank #304 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 30.0.

Side by side

Llama 2-13B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Llama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.132.2
Released2023-07-18—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding10621210

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10511208
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench42.2%—
BIG-Bench Hard58.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index105.8—
HellaSwag80.7%—
LAMBADA76.5%—
PIQA80.8%—
WinoGrande72.8%—

Math Llama 2-13B leads

Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math10651208
Omni-MATH—16.1%
GSM8K36.9%—

Knowledge Llama 2-13B leads

Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1030—
ARC (AI2) Challenge60.3%—
BoolQ82.4%—
MMLU55.6%—
OpenBookQA57%—
TriviaQA79.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-13B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ScienceQA55.8%—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10241160
LMArena Chinese10011192
LMArena Russian10551187
LMArena French1043—
LMArena German1009—
LMArena Japanese894—
LMArena Korean953—
LMArena Spanish1086—

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10461186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10641194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text10851218
LMArena Creative Writing10471199
LMArena Multi-Turn10501221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-13B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-13B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper