Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 29.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 50.1% for Claude 3 Haiku and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index25.945.2
Released2024-03-072026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked3727

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding11991503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
ALE-Bench—899.8
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11741488
DTBench50.1%84.5%
LMCA8.8%29.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
CritPt—4%
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math11881481
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
ProofBench—22%
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert11481503
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English11781449
LMArena Chinese11551507
LMArena French11951488
LMArena German11741458
LMArena Japanese11021412
LMArena Korean11091437
LMArena Russian12041450
LMArena Spanish11661471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11731477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query11901483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text11951465
LMArena Creative Writing11571440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing7171493
LMArena Multi-Turn11901477
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper