Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.7

Rank #333 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 49.3 to 9.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.8% for Claude 3 Haiku and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.745.0
Released2024-03-072026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked3732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding11991473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts11741460
DTBench50.1%84%
LMCA8.8%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index118.3147.39
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%93.3%
LMArena Math11881467
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond36.3%87.9%
LMArena Expert11481467
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision9501281
LMArena Document—1444
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English11781445
LMArena Chinese11551510
LMArena French11941471
LMArena German11741471
LMArena Japanese11021411
LMArena Korean11081416
LMArena Russian12041457
LMArena Spanish11651453

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following11741439

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query11911454

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text11951454
LMArena Creative Writing11571439
LMArena Multi-Turn11901459
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper