Model comparison
Gemma 2 9B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 32.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 44.8 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1480 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1501 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1489 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1470 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1477 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | 1493 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 9B better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 9B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.