Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 4 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 83.3% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | 63.5% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | 65.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 79% | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | 18.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | — |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | 83.4% |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.