Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.0 Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 43.6 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 96.4% for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Results tracked | 53 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.0 (#78), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 653.48 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.6 (#52), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 68.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | — |
| BALROG | 31.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 458.89 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#320), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.41 | 135.06 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
| DTBench | 73.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LMCA | 30.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 44.9 (#78), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 96.4% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 56.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.7 (#153), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | 65.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 26.8 (#118), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 4.5: 49.9 (#129), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1408 | — |
| LMArena German | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.4 (#149), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| IFEval | 80.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#92), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude Haiku 4.5 leads
Claude Haiku 4.5: 57.9 (#123), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | — |
| WildBench | 83.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1064 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.0 Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.