Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemini 2.0 Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.1 to 21.6.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemini 2.0 Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.