Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 5 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 14.7.
  • Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
Claude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderAnthropicNVIDIA
Noometry Index29.231.8
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked499

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding12861025
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts12511047
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math12441072
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English12381063
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following12411060
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1261998

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text12551098
LMArena Creative Writing12331091
LMArena Multi-Turn12651058
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper