Model comparison
GPT-4 vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 5 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 10.8.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2023-03-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4 leads
GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1254 | 1025 |
| WeirdML | 12.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 36.1% | — |
Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1047 |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 62.7% | — |
| LMCA | 17.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 75.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.89 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 95.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.5% | — |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1072 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 23% | — |
| GSM8K | 92% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| MMLU | 86.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.8% | — |
Multilingual GPT-4 leads
GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1246 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena French | 1283 | — |
| LMArena German | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4 leads
GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1060 |
Long Context GPT-4 leads
GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1244 | 998 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4 leads
GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1257 | 1058 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 752 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4 or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
GPT-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.