Noometry

Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 20.0 to 14.8.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.829.3
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding10251101
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10471100
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math10721151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Too close to call

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10631058
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Russian—1111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10601087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query9981088

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text10981110
LMArena Creative Writing10911083
LMArena Multi-Turn10581068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper