Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 35 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) in 8 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 24.4 to 13.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 46.4% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 70.4% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024).
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2024-02-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 30.7% | 22.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | 43.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | 1294 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | 57.5% |
| CadEval | 32% | 34% |
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| SciCode | 27.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 79.3% |
| MBPP+ | — | 74.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 19.3% | 21% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 3.4% |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1296 |
| DTBench | 56.7% | 59% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 131.73 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 27.1% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 89.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.4 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | 23.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | 36.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1244 | 1315 |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | 70.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | 57.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | 13.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | 53.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | 1279 |
| MMLU | 74.3% | 86.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.6% |
Multimodal Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | 1161 |
| Video-MME | — | 75% |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | 1312 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | 1262 | 1301 |
| LMArena German | 1237 | 1286 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1292 |
| LMArena Korean | 1172 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | 1320 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1310 |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 79.2% | 83.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | 1308 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | 1333 |
| WildBench | 76% | 81.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1296 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 32.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) share?
35 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45.