Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Falcon-180B

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Falcon-180B Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 3 categories and Falcon-180B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Claude 3.5 Haiku leads 40.0 to 25.2.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
ProviderAnthropicTechnology Innovation Institute
Noometry Index29.232.2
Released2024-10-222023-09-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1286—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
LMArena Hard Prompts12511007
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15112.13
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
HellaSwag—89%
LAMBADA—79.8%
LiveBench43.5%—
PIQA—84.9%
WinoGrande—87.1%

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
MMLU74.3%70.6%
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—67.8%
BoolQ—89%
OpenBookQA—64.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
LMArena Non-English12381000
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
LMArena Instruction Following12411047
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuFalcon-180B
LMArena Text12551054
LMArena Creative Writing12331089
LMArena Multi-Turn12651013
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Falcon-180B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Falcon-180B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper