Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Laguna M.1

Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Laguna M.1 Poolside

32.5

Rank #256 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Laguna M.1 leads 21.1 to 14.7.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Laguna M.1 specifications
Claude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
ProviderAnthropicPoolside
Noometry Index29.232.5
Released2024-10-222026-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked493

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Laguna M.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
Aider Polyglot28%—
LMArena WebDev—1349
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1286—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Laguna M.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Laguna M.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
ProofBench—0%
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Laguna M.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Laguna M.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Laguna M.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Laguna M.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Laguna M.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Laguna M.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuLaguna M.1
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Laguna M.1?

Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Laguna M.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper