Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.