Model comparison
Claude 2 vs GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 98.9% for GPT-6 Luna.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 53.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 66.6% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1581 |
| SciCode | — | 54.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1439 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,577 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 2: —, GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 44.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23% |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 90.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 156.28 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 59.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 86.7% |
| CritPt | — | 19.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 31% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1411 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| LMCA | — | 44.5% |
Math GPT-6 Luna leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 98.9% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 78.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 56.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 64% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 90.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1217 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 31.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 44.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1433 |
| LMArena French | — | 1420 |
| LMArena German | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1394 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1393 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1409 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1396 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and GPT-6 Luna share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 42.