Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Luna leads 54.7 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 45.1 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 66.6% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1583 |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1448 |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1415 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math GPT-6 Luna leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1458 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 44.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1414 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1417 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1400 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GPT-6 Luna share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 18.