Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.8

Rank #341 Confirmed

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

45.1

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-6 Luna leads 40.1 to 7.1.
  • DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and GPT-6 Luna specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index24.845.1
Released2023-11-292026-09-22
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1518

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Coding10961448
DeepSWE—66.6%
FrontierCode—42.4%
LMArena WebDev—1583

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Hard Prompts10701415
NYT Connections (extended)—68.7%
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.54—

Math GPT-6 Luna leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Math11081396
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1458

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
Furniture Assembly—44.2%

Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Non-English10731390
LMArena Chinese11321425
LMArena Russian—1392
LMArena Spanish—1416

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Instruction Following10791414

Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Longer Query10921417

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Text11051392
LMArena Creative Writing10671357
LMArena Multi-Turn10821400

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and GPT-6 Luna share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper