Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 41.1 to 8.7.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 46.6 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1423 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1409 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1393 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1413 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1406 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1389 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Grok 4.7 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.