Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 35.4 to 25.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Claude 2.1 and 46.3% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 32.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1236 |
Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 4.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 46.3% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1233 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.