Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs GPT-5.4 mini

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

45.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 mini in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.5 to 15.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 88.9% for GPT-5.4 mini.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and GPT-5.4 mini specifications
Claude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.245.0
Released2023-11-212026-03-17
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.75
Output $ / M tokens—$4.50
Results tracked746

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
WeirdML7.1%60.3%
FrontierCode—27%
LMArena WebDev—1397
SciCode—49.9%
LMArena Coding—1438
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
DeepResearch Bench—36.3%

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
DTBench51%80%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27148.84
ForecastBench54.257
ARC-AGI-2—18.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—37.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—61.8%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Thematic Generalization—61.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1424
Mystery Game Puzzles—11%
LMCA—40.8%

Math GPT-5.4 mini leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%88.9%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—51.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—9.8%
ProofBench—21%
LMArena Math—1419
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—28.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
GPQA Diamond33%86.9%
SimpleQA Verified—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.5%
LMArena Expert—1435
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Non-English—1405
LMArena Chinese—1446
LMArena French—1440
LMArena German—1409
LMArena Japanese—1374
LMArena Korean—1368
LMArena Russian—1417
LMArena Spanish—1405

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Instruction Following—1405

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Longer Query—1407

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Text—1412
LMArena Creative Writing—1370
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1665
LMArena Multi-Turn—1429

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than GPT-5.4 mini?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or GPT-5.4 mini better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GPT-5.4 mini share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 mini has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper