Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 10.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51% for Claude 2.1 and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1503 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 84.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1488 |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1503 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1477 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.