Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Claude 2.1
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 39.3 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 25.2 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 7.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.27 |
| ForecastBench | — | 54.2 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1438 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 33% |
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | — |
| MMLU | — | 73.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Claude 2.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Claude 2.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Claude 2.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Claude 2.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Claude 2.1?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Claude 2.1 better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Claude 2.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Claude 2.1 has 7.