Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Magistral Medium
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 22.3 to 8.6.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Medium leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1267 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1250 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1227 |
| LMArena French | — | 1267 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1254 |
Long Context Magistral Medium leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Magistral Medium?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Magistral Medium better for coding?
Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Magistral Medium share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.