Model comparison

Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Lite Amazon

31.9

Rank #265 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.8

Rank #322 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Lite leads 42.1 to 23.8.
  • Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen1.5 4b Chat specifications
Amazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.928.8
Released2024-12-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.24—
Results tracked3413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1239999
LiveBench Coding27.5%—
ALE-Bench236.25—

Reasoning Too close to call

Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1220976
LiveBench Reasoning36.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis37.2%—
LiveBench36.4%—

Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math12271026
Omni-MATH23.3%—
LiveBench Math36.7%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1201980
Humanity's Last Exam3.6%—
MMLU-Pro60%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%—
GPQA (HELM)39.7%—
MMLU77%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Vision990—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1208979
LMArena Chinese12251024
LMArena German1229902
LMArena Russian1216952
LMArena French1237—
LMArena Japanese1153—
LMArena Korean1153—
LMArena Spanish1226—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1205978
LiveBench Instruction Following54.1%—
IFEval77.6%—

Long Context Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1234988

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Lite leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1229997
LMArena Creative Writing1197969
LMArena Multi-Turn1199977
WildBench75%—
LiveBench Language25.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Amazon Nova Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper