Model comparison
Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Lite leads 27.8 to 12.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 60% for Amazon Nova Lite and 53.9% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $0.17 / $0.70 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Amazon Nova Lite accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 29.0 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | 131K |
| Max output | 10K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.24 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.51 |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | 29.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1227 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | 34.1% |
| MMLU | 77% | 72.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | — |
| LMArena French | 1237 | — |
| LMArena German | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 77.6% | 74.1% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 75% | 73.1% |
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct lists at $0.17 and $0.70.
Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Lite does, with 300K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.