Model comparison

Mistral Large vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

Mistral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.8

Rank #322 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Large scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Mistral Large leads 67.9 to 49.0.

Side by side

Mistral Large and Qwen1.5 4b Chat specifications
Mistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.928.8
Released2024-02-26—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked5113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large leads

Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1277999
SciCode36.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct30%—
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete38.3%—
ALE-Bench264.7—
HumanEval+62.2%—
MBPP+59.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard38.4%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads

Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1257976
SimpleBench22.5%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.5%—
DTBench65.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis50.1%—
LMCA16.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.52—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench48.4%—

Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads

Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math12621026
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.5%—
Omni-MATH28.1%—
LiveBench Math42.5%—
MATH Level 550.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Mistral Large leads

Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1232980
GPQA Diamond51.3%—
MMLU-Pro59.9%—
Confabulations21.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.5%—
GPQA (HELM)43.5%—
MMLU80%—

Multilingual Mistral Large leads

Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1237979
LMArena Chinese12401024
LMArena German1254902
LMArena Russian1257952
LMArena French1325—
LMArena Japanese1188—
LMArena Korean1202—
LMArena Spanish1268—

Instruction Following Mistral Large leads

Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1249978
LiveBench Instruction Following67.9%—
IFEval87.7%—

Long Context Mistral Large leads

Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1261988

Writing & Preference Mistral Large leads

Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1266997
LMArena Creative Writing1243969
LMArena Multi-Turn1260977
Short-Story Creative Writing69%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing985—
WildBench80.1%—
LiveBench Language39.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Mistral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Large or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Mistral Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper