Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 23.8.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 28.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 976 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.