Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen-14B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.5 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1071 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1077 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1031 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen-14B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.