Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Magistral Small
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 27.3 to 6.9.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 29.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1425 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena French | 1426 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1327 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Magistral Small?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Magistral Small better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Magistral Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.