Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Codestral
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 41.6 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 30.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.90 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 11.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 137.78 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 73.8% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.9% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 32.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Codestral?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Codestral better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Codestral share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Codestral has 7.