Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Magistral Small

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 4 categories and Magistral Small in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 26.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat and 6.3% for Magistral Small.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Magistral Small specifications
Longcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
ProviderMeituanMistral AI
Noometry Index42.130.2
Released—2025-06-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—40K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$1.50
Results tracked1910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
SciCode—35.2%
LMArena Coding1471—

Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%6.3%
ARC-AGI-2—0%
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
ARC-AGI-1—5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1440—
DTBench—61.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—133.19

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30%
LMArena Math1442—

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
LMArena Expert1454—

Multilingual Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Magistral Small: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
LMArena Non-English1404—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Japanese1373—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Russian1395—
LMArena Spanish1445—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Magistral Small: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following1411—

Long Context Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Magistral Small: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
LMArena Longer Query1425—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Magistral Small: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMagistral Small
LMArena Text1427—
LMArena Creative Writing1388—
LMArena Multi-Turn1418—

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Magistral Small?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Magistral Small better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Magistral Small share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper