Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen1.5-32B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.5

Rank #293 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 38.5 to 13.5.
  • Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen1.5-32B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.130.5
Released—2024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Coding14121155
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—42%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts13961130

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math14251155

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Expert13861126
GPQA Diamond—30.7%
MMLU—74.4%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English13721106
LMArena Chinese14041177
LMArena French14251101
LMArena German13911058
LMArena Japanese13601027
LMArena Korean13241008
LMArena Russian13711073
LMArena Spanish13821089

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following13651116

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query13701146

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text13941137
LMArena Creative Writing13181083
LMArena Multi-Turn13641140

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen1.5-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper