Model comparison
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 vs Wizardlm 13b
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
StepFun
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.3 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1316 | 1035 |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1018 |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1304 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | — |
Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1290 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | — |
Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1287 | 1048 |
Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1307 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1321 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1328 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1292 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Step 2 16k Exp 202412 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.