Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Solar Pro4

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher in 7 categories and Solar Pro4 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 39.8.
  • Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 524K.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Upstage
Noometry Index45.342.1
Released2026-06-022026-08-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M524K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$1.60$1.20
Results tracked3218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Solar Pro4 leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Coding14731437
FrontierCode10.2%—
LMArena WebDev—1371
SciCode45.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138), Solar Pro4: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
OSWorld 2.02.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts14601399
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
CritPt9.1%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench84%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index147.37—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Math14661416
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)34.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert14671427
GPQA Diamond87.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33), Solar Pro4: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Vision1279—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English14451361
LMArena Chinese15101415
LMArena French14731397
LMArena German14711364
LMArena Japanese14131309
LMArena Korean14151382
LMArena Russian14571360
LMArena Spanish14571401

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following14401377

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query14551381

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusSolar Pro4
LMArena Text14551386
LMArena Creative Writing14391316
LMArena Multi-Turn14601385

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Solar Pro4?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Plus has 32 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper