Noometry

Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 19.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Longcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderMeituanAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.145.3
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding14711473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%74.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14401460
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math14421466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert14541467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14041445
LMArena Chinese14651510
LMArena French14561473
LMArena German14081471
LMArena Japanese13731413
LMArena Korean13711415
LMArena Russian13951457
LMArena Spanish14451457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14111440

Long Context Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14251455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14271455
LMArena Creative Writing13881439
LMArena Multi-Turn14181460

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper