Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Max Preview vs Solar Pro4

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Solar Pro4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 56.5.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Solar Pro4 specifications
Qwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Upstage
Noometry Index45.342.1
Released—2026-08-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—524K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Coding14871437
LMArena WebDev—1371

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts14831399

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Math14741416

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert14891427

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English14651361
LMArena Chinese15341415
LMArena French14841397
LMArena German14871364
LMArena Japanese14951309
LMArena Korean14381382
LMArena Russian14711360
LMArena Spanish14701401

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following14671377

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query14761381

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Text14701386
LMArena Creative Writing14641316
LMArena Multi-Turn14781385

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview better than Solar Pro4?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper