Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.7 Flash in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 21.6.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
  • Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 Flash and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
Qwen3.7 FlashStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index39.937.3
Released2026-07-152026-05-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M256K
Max output131K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.03$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$0.13$1.11
Results tracked75

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashStep 3.7 Flash
SciCode—40%
ALE-Bench—694.12

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashStep 3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)43.8%39.7%
CritPt—2.3%
Chess Puzzles23%—
Mystery Game Puzzles15%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.64—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashStep 3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)19.3%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashStep 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond82.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Step 3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper