Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 32.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 37.8% for GPT-4.5 and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.

Side by side

GPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.239.9
Released2025-02-272026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—
LMArena Coding1396—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74144.64
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
Chess Puzzles—23%
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1403—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
LiveBench Math69.3%—
LMArena Math1412—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond68.7%82.3%
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—
LMArena Expert1394—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1413—
LMArena Chinese1421—
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1419—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1406—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1417—
LMArena Creative Writing1394—
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LMArena Multi-Turn1444—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper