Model comparison

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Step 3.7 Flash

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 37.5.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
Nemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderNVIDIAStepFun
Noometry Index40.037.3
Released2026-08-112026-05-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K256K
Max output262K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$0.20$1.11
Results tracked185

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
SciCode—40%
LMArena Coding1375—
ALE-Bench—694.12

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
CritPt—2.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1337—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
LMArena Math1359—

Knowledge Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Expert1356—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1295—
LMArena Chinese1359—
LMArena French1366—
LMArena German1282—
LMArena Japanese1206—
LMArena Korean1238—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1345—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1318—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1314—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1327—
LMArena Creative Writing1254—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1280—
LMArena Multi-Turn1328—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Step 3.7 Flash?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper