Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 68× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 38.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash and 64.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Qwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.951.5
Released2026-07-152026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.03$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.13$7.50
Results tracked733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
LMArena Coding—1498
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
NYT Connections (extended)43.8%85.1%
Chess Puzzles23%19%
Mystery Game Puzzles15%32%
Epoch Capabilities Index144.64153.68
SimpleBench—70.4%
CritPt—13.4%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)19.3%64.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%95.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1490

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond82.3%90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
LMArena Expert—1488

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1530
LMArena Russian—1484

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1460

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1449
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LMArena Multi-Turn—1481

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 68× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper