Model comparison
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 53× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Max Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 54.1 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 74.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 51.5 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.30 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.80 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 76.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1482 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4,254 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.1% | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.24 | 144.64 |
| SimpleBench | 63% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | — |
| DTBench | 87.2% | — |
| LMCA | 42.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1465 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 23.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.4% | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1487 | — |
| LMArena French | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1438 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1457 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 53× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Max Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.