Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 13.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 55.6% for Grok 3 and 95.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

Grok 3Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.951.5
Released2025-04-092026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked4033

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding14321498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
WeirdML37.2%—
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
BALROG29.5%—
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench36.1%70.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14341483
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33153.68
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%95.6%
LMArena Math13911490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
ProofBench—26%
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond75.8%90.9%
LMArena Expert14211488
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14101474
LMArena Chinese14481530
LMArena Russian14161484
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1387—
LMArena Korean1373—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14091460
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14391482
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14261476
LMArena Creative Writing14141449
LMArena Multi-Turn14251481
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper