Model comparison
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Yi-34B
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 7.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 83.3% for Qwen3.6 Flash and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-27 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.19 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.13 | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
| ALE-Bench | 326.4 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.26 | 117.39 |
| SimpleBench | 35.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1104 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 18% | — |
| DTBench | 77.1% | — |
| LMCA | 31% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 22.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 10.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 14.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 15.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1061 |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1091 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 Flash better than Yi-34B?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Flash and Yi-34B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.