Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Yi-34B
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 7.5.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 27.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | 1112 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1176 |
| LMArena German | 1231 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | 993 |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | 1050 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1091 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Yi-34B?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Yi-34B better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Yi-34B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.