Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Wizardlm 13b
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 30.5.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1035 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1018 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1048 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Wizardlm 13b?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.