Model comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b has enough public results to be ranked (#274); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 30.1.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-09 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.35 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 79.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b has enough public results to be ranked (#274); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.